[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] LibreOffice packaging repository branch, debian-experimental-3.5, updated. libreoffice_3.5.0-2-13-ga90ec92



The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit ff3ff1a7ff7ebc836041bcfaf43bcb9d6647d653
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date:   Fri Feb 24 10:42:03 2012 +0100

    remove obsolete libmono-dev build-conflicts

diff --git a/control.in b/control.in
index 0138357..2153e2c 100644
--- a/control.in
+++ b/control.in
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1),
  wget | curl
  %BUILD_DEPS%
 Build-Depends-Indep: fdupes, xml-core, imagemagick %BUILD_DEPS_INDEP%
-Build-Conflicts: libcairo2 (= 1.4.8-1), libxul-dev (= 1.8.0.13~pre070720-0etch1), gjdoc (= 0.7.8-2), libc6-dev (= 2.6.1-3) [i386 amd64], libc6-dev (= 2.6.1-4) [i386 amd64], nvidia-glx-dev, nvidia-glx-legacy-dev, libmono-dev (= 1.2.6+dfsg-1), libmono-dev (= 1.2.6+dfsg-2), libmono-dev (= 1.2.6+dfsg-3), libmono-dev (= 1.2.6+dfsg-4), libmono-dev (= 2.4+dfsg-2) [sparc], gcj-4.2 (= 4.2.2-6), flex (= 2.5.34-1) [amd64], libboost1.39-dev (<< 1.39.0-2), graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat (<< 1.3.9~), qt3-dev-tools, ant (= 1.8.0-1) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], ant (= 1.8.0-2) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], ant (= 1.8.0-3) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], g++-4.6 (= 4.6.1-10), g++-4.6 (= 4.6.1-11)
+Build-Conflicts: libcairo2 (= 1.4.8-1), libxul-dev (= 1.8.0.13~pre070720-0etch1), gjdoc (= 0.7.8-2), libc6-dev (= 2.6.1-3) [i386 amd64], libc6-dev (= 2.6.1-4) [i386 amd64], nvidia-glx-dev, nvidia-glx-legacy-dev, gcj-4.2 (= 4.2.2-6), flex (= 2.5.34-1) [amd64], libboost1.39-dev (<< 1.39.0-2), graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat (<< 1.3.9~), qt3-dev-tools, ant (= 1.8.0-1) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], ant (= 1.8.0-2) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], ant (= 1.8.0-3) [%OOO_GCJ_JDK_ARCHS%], g++-4.6 (= 4.6.1-10), g++-4.6 (= 4.6.1-11)
 Standards-Version: 3.9.1
 XS-Python-Version: @PYTHON_VERSION@
 Vcs-Git: https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git

-- 
LibreOffice packaging repository


Reply to: