[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#633929: also seeing this bug



Hi,

On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:19:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> found 633929 1:3.4.5-5
> tag 633929 -moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> I get this when starting libreoffice without any file.
> 
> I too have deleted .libreoffice and .openoffice.org2. Both directories

.openoffice.org2 should not be created by LO. no?

> Googleing for "A general error occurred while accessing your central
> configuration." will find several other people with the same problem,
> or at least the same error message, going back at least to 2010.
> 
> It seems likely to be caused by mismatches between different installed
> parts of libreoffice. See my list of versions below. And it went away
> when I dist-upgraded a consistent set of versions. So, fixing this in
> debian would seem to involve some tighter dependency versioning.

Probably. But see below.

> This probably explains why the reports I have found involve either:
> 
> a) Debian (or Ubuntu), which split libreoffice into lots of parts
> b) other users who are manually installing plugins, etc.
[...]
> ii  libreoffice                                     1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite
> ii  libreoffice-base                                1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- database
> ii  libreoffice-base-core                           1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- shared library
> ii  libreoffice-calc                                1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- spreadsheet
> ii  libreoffice-common                              1:3.4.6-2                       office productivity suite -- arch-independent files
> ii  libreoffice-core                                1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- arch-dependent files

Here we have a difference 1:3.4.5-5 vs 1:1:3.4.6-2. Minor bugfix-only release.
Shouldn't affect that.

> ii  libreoffice-draw                                1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- drawing
> ii  libreoffice-emailmerge                          1:3.5.2~rc2-1                   office productivity suite -- email mail merge
> ii  libreoffice-filter-binfilter                    1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- legacy filters (e.g. StarOffice 5.2)
> ii  libreoffice-filter-mobiledev                    1:3.5.2~rc2-1                   office productivity suite -- mobile devices filters
> ii  libreoffice-gtk                                 1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- GTK+ integration
> ii  libreoffice-help-en-us                          1:3.5.2~rc2-1                   office productivity suite -- English_american help
> ii  libreoffice-impress                             1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- presentation
> ii  libreoffice-java-common                         1:3.5.2~rc2-1                   office productivity suite -- arch-independent Java support files
> ii  libreoffice-math                                1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- equation editor
> ii  libreoffice-report-builder-bin                  1:3.4.6-2                       LibreOffice extension for building database reports -- libraries
> ii  libreoffice-style-galaxy                        1:3.4.6-2                       office productivity suite -- Galaxy (Default) symbol style
> ii  libreoffice-writer                              1:3.4.5-5                       office productivity suite -- word processor

The rest is icons (libreoffice-style-galaxy), SRB libs only used when -report-builder
is used (libreoffice-report-builder-bin) and filters/help. Where I could imagine
some breakage is -emailmerge (but that simply uses python-uno via python) or
libreoffice-java-common (which contains the Java support stuff)

Would you mind - if you can reproduce it - upgrading the ones I mentioned step by ste
until it starts working?

Regards,

Rene



Reply to: