[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#330447: help is buggy-looking/useless without...help package



Rene Engelhard a écrit :

Hi,

please quote properly. Thanks.
Hi Rene,
I use Mozilla Thunderbird and replied directly to your mail. I chose "Send as normal text only" when sending. I wish the MUA would offer to see what choosing this will make the mail look like, but it doesn't, so I always hope it's OK. However, I checked bugs.d.o and couldn't figure out what you mean. I don't really like mail, but since I use Debian, I guess I should still learn to use it properly ;) I'd appreciate if you can explain me what's wrong in my previous mail, and perhaps how to fix it if that's not obvious. Otherwise, I'll just continue to annoy you, like with this mail :)

Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Well, it says you are missing the help, isn't it?

More or less. It says that...a "requested document does not exist in the database". There are two ways to interpret this. First, OOo requested a document that isn't there...because it's buggy, as the first idea. Or,

It isn't there because the help is not there. If there's no help
package installed there's no help. Simple as that.

There's no help document. So why does OOo request one? That's the idea. I realize that the bug title I chose doesn't make great sense. I think it's better to ignore the "/useless" part.

How can OOo make clear that the second possibility is the right one? By saying that help is not available without an appropriate help package.

It is said. Go read the package description. "[..]. and help are not
included in this package. [...]"

BTW, I don't know how Debian packages are supposed to handle these cases, where upstream design assumes a functionality is present but Debian packaging makes that functionality optional. "Contact your system administrator."? I don't know. The bug is certainly minor, but the fix

No. "Just install the package". That's why it's suggested. We can't
recommend it and depending on it would be bogus and also not allowed.

Right... "Just install the package", unless you're not the system administrator, in which case you can't. I'm not asking to reconsider the dependency level on the help packages, only to perhaps behave a bit better given the current Suggests.

might not be straightforward.

Of course it is. Install the help.
I was talking about the easyness to fix for the developers, not the admins.

Me neither. I'd only like a clear explanation of what happens. And I'd only "like", I don't expect it...I understand that getting minor bugs

You got it through the package description.

like that reported can be frustrating. If this is too time-consuming to fix, finding the report might still be useful to a new admin thinking it's a bug.

IMHO it is *no* bug. OOo just tells you what the issue is: The help isn't
there.

Well...

I'll leave it open anyway and reassign it to openoffice.org2, because OOo2
will just say "The help application could not be started" which *is* not
obvious[1]. But your problem on 1.1.x *is*.
OK. Since I guess that OOo2 is close enough, and you recognize that something could be improved in it, arguing more about 1 must be useless.

When I said that "it would be nice to have some clear note that help will be useless without a help package", the emphasis isn't on "help will be useless", which is obvious, it's on "without a help package", which admins may not realize.

See above. Admins should read what they install..
We just agreed that arguing about 1 was useless. Let me still put you in another context a bit, if you want...you can skip the rest otherwise. There are 2 French-speaking students studying at a university using Sarge and OOo. Neither are admins of the PCs. The one that doesn't know Debian starts OOo and realizes it's in English. Ah well, it will be great if they can translate it to French. Meanwhile, the other student that knows Debian realizes the same and mails the sysadmin to install ooo-l10n-fr...just like I did last week. We can't do much about that first issue. Now the one that knows Debian tries accessing the help. He realizes the package is missing and mails the sysadmin again to ask to install the a help package. Meanwhile, the student that doesn't know Debian tries the same. In the current state of OOo packaging, that student is likely to conclude that OOo is buggy...and he may think that not having working Help is a pretty big bug. So who's wrong? Even I didn't read the description of all the packages on my system. You can't expect a simple user to do that. The admins simply forgot to install a package. Remember, that happened for the l10n in my own university...I wouldn't be surprised if I got back to the lab tomorrow and the help wasn't there. Ideally, both students would mail the sysadmin, and he'd be annoyed enough to install the package more quickly :)

Thanks again



Reply to: