Hi .. On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:39:27AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: >>i was very happy with your openoffice packages for debian, till i >>updated my apt-sources today and ran into trouble with the installed >>OpenOffice on my Woody-Box. There are now unsatisfied dependencies >>(libc6, libgcc1, libstdc++5) that needs some packages from >>sarge/testing. But i wanted to stay with my stable box. >>I wanted to know if it is a big problem to release an openoffice >>version for the woody/stable distribution. That would be very fine and >>other users would be happy also. >I'm interested also, though don't have the horsepower to compile it on >one of my machines. I will do that this this weekend and the next week. I do not know, how much time it will take ... first, I need a I386 with 5-7 GB for me ;) >Maybe someone already did so? >I used to, but with one of the first packages that appeared for 1.0.0. >I don't care for PPC, I only need an i386 version. I will do it for both, because, I have a PPC and I am responseable for PPC packages .. :) >I also read there will be a problem with sid, because libstlport is no >longer maintained in a recent version because of other troubles? What's >the point in fact? libstlport is already maintained by Torsten Werner. He created a package uploeded it, which is build with gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.2 but this is rejected by the ftp-master. Since OOo depends to that package, it will rejected, too, I think ... Regards Jan -- .''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- jan.palic@linux-debian.de | ' ` `
Attachment:
pgptZnQcqfTWZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature