On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:15:46PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> This information came to me, thanks to ocaml-magic developper's sagacity:
> ocaml modules should ship both .cmxa and .cmx.
>
> Not shipping .cmx files is not a big issue, but it prevents some compiler
> optimisations..
Indeed is a frequently overlooked issue.
> We could even think about mass bug submission about this don't you think ?
Good practice in this case is to have data first, patch policy next, and
finally go ahead with a mass bug filing. If you are interested in to it
by all means go ahead, but please start with a script which detects which
packages are buggy in this respect and then post results here.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature