Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> (10/09/2007): > You should create 2 packages: "libgv-ocaml" should contain only the > .so, but should ship it under /usr/lib/ocaml/3.10/stublibs/; the other > (a new one) "libgv-ocaml-dev" should contain the compiled version of > gv.ml{,i} and ship it under /usr/lib/ocaml/3.10/graphviz/. More > details on how to do that can be found in the policy. OK, I wasn't sure how the policy applies to this particular case (and I've still have to read it more thoroughly). I'm wondering whether putting the (OCaml) -dev part into the libgraphvizN-dev package would be acceptable, so as to limit the number of binary packages I'm building from a single source package. > If you are maintaining graphviz collaboratively on some repository I > guess we can find some of us willing to do the work directly on the > graphviz package. Just let us know. You can find the git tree on git.debian.org, any patch is very welcome. (And I'm also back on #debian-ocaml, now that my bouncer's back.) Thanks for your help. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgp_o9CQqBKwz.pgp
Description: PGP signature