Bug#916333: dav1d_0.5.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Dylan Aïssi <daissi@debian.org>]

Hi,

Le mar. 31 déc. 2019 à 21:50, James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org> a écrit :
>
> The AOM patent license is not a copyright license but rather an
> "optional extra" which grants users patent rights under some extra
> conditions. You would usually use it along with an additional license to
> cover all the copyright related parts which the DFSG is more concerned
> about.
>
> In aom, I put the patent license in a "Comment" section at the top and
> don't mention it in any "License" clauses which I think makes this
> distinction between copyright and patent issues a bit clearer.

Thanks James for this explanation!

The files from the package dav1d which are "covered" by the "optional
extra" AOM patent license have exactly the same header as these from
the package aom. So, I will write the d/copyright file like you did
for aom. I hope this will be fine.

Best,
Dylan