[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: EURid Mirror update and removal



Hi,

Sven Meeus - EURid Operations wrote:
> We are doing some changes on our networks, and one of these is switching
> providers and datacenters.
> 
> Our current mirror.eurid.eu should be removed from the list and instead
> it will be updated by 2 new submissions.
> We will have be.mirror.eurid.eu and nl.mirror.eurid.eu and the current
> mirror.eurid.eu will point to both.

Thanks for the heads up. Apparently no action on this had been taken so far.

These are the two entries now in the list, please let me know if there's 
anything that needs to be corrected:

Site: be.mirror.eurid.eu
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: amd64 i386
Archive-ftp: /debian/
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-upstream: ftp.be.debian.org
Backports-ftp: /debian-backports/
Backports-http: /debian-backports/
Backports-upstream: ftp.de.debian.org
CDImage-ftp: /debian-cd/
CDImage-http: /debian-cd/
CDImage-upstream: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de
Volatile-architecture: amd64 i386
Volatile-ftp: /debian-volatile/
Volatile-http: /debian-volatile/
Volatile-upstream: ftp.be.debian.org
IPv6: no
Maintainer: EURid Operations <tech@eurid.eu>
Country: BE Belgium
Location: Nossegem
Sponsor: EURid vzw/asbl http://www.eurid.eu/
Bandwidth: 100mbit

Site: nl.mirror.eurid.eu
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: amd64 i386
Archive-ftp: /debian/
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-upstream: be.mirror.eurid.eu
Backports-ftp: /debian-backports/
Backports-http: /debian-backports/
Backports-upstream: be.mirror.eurid.eu
CDImage-ftp: /debian-cd/
CDImage-http: /debian-cd/
CDImage-upstream: be.mirror.eurid.eu
Volatile-architecture: amd64 i386
Volatile-ftp: /debian-volatile/
Volatile-http: /debian-volatile/
Volatile-upstream: be.mirror.eurid.eu
IPv6: no  
Maintainer: EURid Operations <tech@eurid.eu>
Country: NL Netherlands
Sponsor: EURid vzw/asbl http://www.eurid.eu/
Bandwidth: 100mbit

Kind regards,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net


Reply to: