debian.co.il UPDATED i386 arch
Hi guys,
We've updated our mirror with the latest i386 architecture binary packages
and sources,
* The mirror is updated from:
debian.fastweb.it
* This mirror is set to be updated every day at 00:12.
* The following archs have been excluded:
ARCH_EXCLUDE="amd64 alpha arm hppa hurd-i386 ia64 m68k mipsel mips s390
sparc powerpc"
Which leave along only the i386, the reason is the high disk usage.
* The is archive is update via the anonftpsync,v 1.33 script.
* The archive could only be accessed (meanwhile) via HTTP at:
http://www.debian.co.il/debian
* The administrator email address is: archive@debian.co.il (as it was
before) or admin@interhost.co.il
* Current mirror size is 95Gb
* trace file path http://www.debian.co.il/debian/project/trace/debian.co.il
* For any questions or comments please mail me or call +972543181182 Dmitry
Sherman
The mirror was not updated long time due to disk space problem we had which
is solved now.
Please add the mirror to the lists, thanks.
Dmitry Sherman C.E.O
INTERHOST - Network Solutions
Phone: +972-543181182
Fax: +972-577976157
E-mail: dmitry@interhost.co.il
web: http://www.interhost.co.il/
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Paillard [mailto:simon.paillard@resel.enst-bretagne.fr]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:54 PM
To: Lior Kaplan; Dmitry Sherman
Cc: debian-mirrors@lists.debian.org
Subject: debian.co.il severely outdated
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 09:45:09PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> Lior Kaplan wrote:
> > http://www.debian.co.il/debian was last updated on June 5th.
actually, May 29 08:00:01 UTC 2007 according to
http://debian.co.il/debian/project/trace/ftp-master.debian.org
> Please remove this mirror from the list.
I comment it for the moment.
The admin of debian.co.il is in CC. As far as I remember, a mail has
already been sent to notice him the mirror is outdated.
Dmitry, could you please fix your mirror as soon as possible ? It is now
more than 2 months late !
If you cannot, please tell us so that we remove your mirror from the
list.
Best regards,
--
Simon Paillard
Reply to: