Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:25:36PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Speaking of which, the 'all of them' setting will generate > > > "Archive-architecture: ALL", so I figure you might want to adjust any > > > parsers to account for people pasting that in as is. > > > > That's no better than leaving it out to signify all architectures, it > > poses the same problems with installers for architectures that are not > > yet in the main archive. > > I disagree, this is at least explicit. Previously, the submissions weren't > force to include any information with regard to what they are mirroring; > now if someone checks 'all of them', then it's safer to assume that they > would not be excluding new architectures by default. I'm talking about architectues that are not in the main archive yet. For example, amd64 in 2004. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature