[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gclcvs



Greetings, and thanks!

Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> 
> |Cc: ..., debian-mipsel@lists.debian.org
> 
> You may have already moticed, there is no such list. mipsel is handled
> together with mips.
> 
> > Greetings!  The latest gclcvs autobuild succeeds on mipsel with
> > 
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-16 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.4-11 g++-3.3_1:3.3.4-11 binutils_2.15-3 libstdc++5_1:3.3.4-11 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.4-11
> > 
> > and fails on mips with
> > 
> > Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-16 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.4-9 g++-3.3_1:3.3.4-9 binutils_2.15-3 libstdc++5_1:3.3.4-9 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.4-9
> > 
> > 
> > Is this to be expected?  If so, are the newer compiler packages going
> > into mips?  If so, can gclcvs be requeued with these?
> 
> The mips buildlog says:
> 
>  Initializing pcl_gazonk3.o
> 
>  Error: Caught fatal error [memory may be damaged]
>  Error signalled by UPDATE-INITIALIZE-INFO-INTERNAL.
>  Broken at SYSTEM::BREAK-LEVEL.  Type :H for Help.
>  PCL>>
>  T
>  >>
>  #<"USER" package>
>  >>rm init_pcl_gcl.lsp raw_pcl_gcl
>  make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0/unixport'
>  (cd clcs; rm -f *.c; /usr/bin/make all)
> 
> Which may have caused the error. This appears to be some transient
> buildd error.
> 

Indeed.  Does this mean it will automatically be requeued?  Surely
there is no substantive difference between mips and mipsel at present?
I'd try to build it myself on casals were it not for the login message
instructing me not to do so.  Where does one do by-hand builds for
mips/mipsel? 

Take care,

> 
> Thiemo
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire			     			camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah



Reply to: