Re: kernel vs binutils

To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>
Cc: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel vs binutils
From: Guido Guenther <guido.guenther@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:40:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010829134027.B12192@galadriel.physik.uni-konstanz.de>
Mail-followup-to: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>, debian-mips@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 004501c1307d$b1d62050$3501010a@ltc.com>; from brad@ltc.com on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:28:14AM -0400
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0108290520090.8984-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com> <[🔎] 004501c1307d$b1d62050$3501010a@ltc.com>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 07:28:14AM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
>    * binutils-2.11.90.0.25 beta release
2.11.90.0.25 worked for me too. In fact the kernel-images in the debian
archive were build with .25. Things broke after that.
Thanks,
 -- Guido

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel vs binutils
  - From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>

References:
- Re: kernel vs binutils
  - From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>
- Re: kernel vs binutils
  - From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@ltc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: kernel vs binutils
Next by Date: Re: kernel vs binutils
Previous by thread: Re: kernel vs binutils
Next by thread: Re: kernel vs binutils
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread