Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)

To: 1020767-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 23:26:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] a7de7879-af77-1d0e-886a-23467b318a21@debian.org>
Reply-to: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>, 1020767-quiet@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f6a0b9ca-8236-39dd-9662-3218bdf0f076@svario.it>
References: <[🔎] f6a0b9ca-8236-39dd-9662-3218bdf0f076@svario.it> <[🔎] f6a0b9ca-8236-39dd-9662-3218bdf0f076@svario.it> <[🔎] f6a0b9ca-8236-39dd-9662-3218bdf0f076@svario.it>

On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:39:08 +0200 Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it> wrote:

Changes since the last upload:

  lsb-release-minimal (12.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
  .
    * New upstream release
    * d/control: Rename binary package to `lsb-release`


This looks like a package hijack. Or is this in coordination with the existing lsb-release package?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
  - From: Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it>

References:
- Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
  - From: Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it>

Prev by Date: Bug#1020543: marked as done (RFS: domdf-python-tools/3.4.0-1 [ITP] -- Helpful functions for Python)
Next by Date: Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
Previous by thread: Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
Next by thread: Bug#1020767: RFS: lsb-release-minimal/12.0-1 -- Linux Standard Base version reporting utility (minimal implementation)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread