On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote: > Maybe I've picked the wrong example, the actual problem was with > libavdevice53, the same soname is used for either 0.8.5-1 and 9.3-1, > but 9.3-1 links to libavcodec54 while 0.8.5-1 links to libavcodec53, so > my binary ended up importing either libavcodec53 and libavcodec54 when > both were installed and did not work. > > I think it will be enough to require libavdevice53 (<< 6:9) in my case. Strictly speaking this restriction won't guarantee anything about libavdevice53 dependencies. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature