[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#673223: marked as done (RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Sep 2012 05:02:47 +0000
with message-id <20120926050247.GA1502@master.debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#673223: RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
has caused the Debian Bug report #673223,
regarding RFS: ipset/6.14-1 -- administration tool for kernel IP sets
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
673223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipset"

 * Package name    : ipset
   Version         : 6.12.1-2
   Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
 * URL             : http://ipset.netfilter.org/
 * License         : GPL
   Section         : net

It builds those binary packages:

  ipset - administration tool for kernel IP sets
  libipset-dev - Development files for IP sets
  libipset2  - IP sets library

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/ipset

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipset/ipset_6.12.1-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

ipset (6.12.1-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Move ipset and lib to /sbin and /lib/[arch triplet] respectively
    * debian/rules, debian/{ipset,libipset2,libipset-dev}.install:
      - Move ipset and lib to the path which independent of /usr.
        It should setup the *set* correctly even the system could not mount
        /usr as same as the iptables does.
        (thanks to Henrique de Moraes Holschuh for suggestion)
  * Add debian/NEWS
    - Inform the users that ipset and lib have been moved to /sbin and
      /lib/[arch triplet] respectively and it does not support the /usr not
      mounted yet until the libmnl moves their library to /lib.
  * Update 90-fix-typo.patch info: Applied-Upstream
  * Add -fstack-protector-all to CFLAGS
    * debian/rules:
      - Add -fstack-protector-all to CFLAGS to force ipset binary hardened
        with stack protector properly.


Best regards,
Neutron Soutmun

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 06:59:54AM +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Bart noticed, you uploaded a new version to Mentors. Should it be uploaded?
> 
> I think it's in the Wheezy freeze and the package is not the fixing
> important bugs, therefore, I have not requested for sponsor yet.
> 
> My intention is waiting until the Wheezy released,

Therefor I'm closing this RFS now.  You can reopen it at any time you want to
request a sponsor.

> but is it OK if it be
> uploaded to 'experimental' first ?

Yes that is OK.

Regards,

Bart Martens

--- End Message ---
Reply to: