Bug#696600: RFS: sun/0.2-1 [ITP] schedule cron or at-jobs at sunrise/set
On 13070 March 1977, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> There still the problem that the package name (sun) might be too generic
> to be included in the archive. What do you think about this concern?
> I've collected some alternatives:
> solar
> suncal
> atsun
> sunrun
> suncycles - makes no sense to me
As the one effectively blocking "sun" as a name, my 2¢ here would be on
suncal. Fits it perfectly IMO.
--
bye, Joerg
1. 0 2. 1 3. 2 4. 3 5. 4 6. 5 7. 6 8. 7
|-) What sort of FTP proxy firewall do you have?
-- libnet-perl 1.16-1
Reply to: