[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#660049: mosh sponsorship and name



Hi Christine,

On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang <christine@spang.cc> wrote:
> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
> 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and entered the archive.
>
> Would you be willing to rename your mosh package to, say, mosh-scheme?
> I'd be happy to then sponsor your package to the archive and be your
> sponsor for future uploads.

Well, mosh seems like an older program, having been begun by the R6RS
process in 2008; but I would concede that keithw/mosh probably has a
larger user base.  As these rename issues can get thorny and mosh is
already in the archive in any case, I'll be willing to rename.
Hopefully the technical barriers will not be too hard to surmount.

Aside: CCing to both bugs to be safe.  However, how should the
existing bugs be handled in this case?  Simply rename the ITP and RFS
to 'mosh-scheme'?

Cheers,
-- 
David Banks  <amoebae@gmail.com>



Reply to: