On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 10:14 +0700, Neutron Soutmun wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Nikolai Lusan <nikolai@lusan.id.au> wrote: > > > > I have a set of rules and files for bulding a dkms package, I simply > > made it require linux-image >= 2.6.35. You have to account for people > > not using distro kernels that may not have the modules built at all. If > > you conflict with linux-image >= 3.0 some people will have problems. I > > did agonise over this for quite some time. > > I have prepared it but dropped at the last moment before upload the > package to mentors. > If it's required by users, I could add it back and your patches are welcome. I guess the major issue at this point would be the kernel that will ship with the next release, if it is set to be a 3.0 or newer kernel then it shouldn't be an issue (similar to things like iptables itself or tools like vlan). I can put the patches in if people think that it would be of use to have a DKMS package around. -- Nikolai Lusan <nikolai@lusan.id.au>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part