Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:09:35 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120121160935.GA4312@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E1RoTeW-000805-4f@hydrogen>
References: <[🔎] E1RoTeW-000805-4f@hydrogen>

* Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com>, 2012-01-21, 00:38:

* Package name    : gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg

Does "non-dfsg" really need to be a part of source package name? What ifFSF decides to free the documentation one day?


--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
  - From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

References:
- RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
  - From: Samuel Bronson <naesten@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: RFS: cxxtest - lightweight xUnit-like framework for C/C++ applications
Next by Date: Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Previous by thread: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Next by thread: Re: RFS: gcc-4.5-doc-non-dfsg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread