Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)

To: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
Subject: Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)
From: Kan-Ru Chen <koster@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:58 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 877h0x6q1h.fsf@isil.kanru.info>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120104173318.63f857ea@tiber> (Tony Houghton's message of "Wed, 4 Jan 2012 17:33:18 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20120104165849.69c08021@tiber> <[🔎] 20120104173318.63f857ea@tiber>

Hi!

Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk> writes:

> Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
> please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.

Unfortunately there is still one missing build-dep: librsvg2-bin. I have
uploaded 2.4.2-1 with this fixed, please fix it in your repository as
well :)

Cheers,
-- 
Kanru

Attachment: pgpF1wdocC4gp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)
  - From: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>

References:
- RFS: roxterm 2.4.1-1
  - From: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>
- RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)
  - From: Tony Houghton <h@realh.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: Please sponsor NMU for python-markdown
Next by Date: Re: RFS: cavez of phear (console game)
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)
Next by thread: Re: RFS: roxterm 2.4.2-1 (was 2.4.1-1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread