No problem to rename these packages (into "cleanpack" and "cleanpack-gui" for example).
The problem is that (i think) I should then use the /usr/share/cleanpack folder instead of /usr/share/clean , which would have these consequences:
- it will potentially break
OS-Uninstaller and Clean-Ubiquity for all people using both applications
at same time (which means several thousands of people using distros
including these tools: Hybryde, Ubuntu Secured Remix, OS-Voyager...).
Reason is that Boot-Repair allows to update its packages and librairies
at start-up, but not the packages of Os-Uninstaller and
Clean-Ubiquity. I can workaround this by allowing Boot-Repair to update also Os-Uninstaller and
Clean-Ubiquity.
- all users who have saved their MBR via Clean-Ubiquity won't be able to restore them simply any more, except if I add a big workaround which scans both /clean and /cleanpack folders
- a short path is more convenient
- it will require several changes in the code --> potential bugs / big loss of time
- i would have to change all documents/posts on forum using this path
that's why i would be very happy if i could keep the /usr/share/clean path ...
Is this ok ?
* Initial release. (Closes: #636977)
(i thought that was the uploader, not me, who had to modify the changelog before uploading)
Regards
Yann