Re: RFS: wmmixer
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:48:22 +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>- Why have urgency=low QA (group) upload in the first line when you
>are doing a proper upload?
Lintian detects the package as orphan and then shows the warning. If
I try to write
"QA (group) upload" in the first line (alone), lintian shows other
I don't know how to avoid the lintian warning. What should I do?
IMHO the lintian
warning message cannot be solved.
>- Aren't you adopting this package? At least #490739 appears to
I am trying to do that.
I think both the non-QA-upload and lintian warning will be fixed by
particular ITA bug in the changelog properly.
>Furthermore, why did you bump the debhelper build dependency to 7.0
>when at the same time not making use of its new simplified
I cannot find the info to rewrite the debian/rules to 7.0
What are the differences? When can I found docs about it.
Please take a look at, e.g.,
Hope this helps,
thanks a lot, very nice documentation.
I changed the rules file except for "binary-arch", because I don't know
how to move the CHANGES file and the example file to the destination
folder. I created two new patches, for the debian paths and the g++
optimization. Before the patches, the rules file includes this
as paramenter (make install /usr and CXXPARM = "xxx"). I think this is
The Maintainer filed was changed to adopt the package and the lintian
has gone. Now the package is lintian clean.
Can you check the package again.
Thanks a lot for your time.
||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/