Hi Daniel, On 09/05/27 09:25 -0700, Daniel Moerner said ... > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <appaji@debian.org> wrote: >> Are there compelling reasons why one would want to use febootstrap as opposed >> to mach? [1]. > > The last upstream release of mach was on April 19, 2007. The list of > supported distributions in the control file seems to predate the Fedora Core > to Fedora renaming. That seems to be the last-upload date to the Debian archive. Upstream released 0.9.4 in Aug 2008. > Febootstrap also seems to have more features. Sure, and looks like apt for rpm is necessary to run mach. Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature