On Saturday 16 May 2009 07:00:00 Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Hi, > > I could not find exactly how "-" and "." are ordered in package names. > Are they equivalent, counting as non-digits? > > My actual problem is: > -current version of qutecom is "2.2~rc3.dfsg1" > -as per lintian warning, the next version will be "+dfsg1" instead of > ".dfsg1" > -latest upstream version is still 2.2~rc3, but I would like to upload a > more recent snapshot from upstream hg. What would be the correct > packager version? > > - "2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1", being lucky that "+hg" comes after "+dfsg" > - "2.2~rc3-hg365+dfsg1", but would have the "-" any drawback I do not see? > > Thanks, > Ludovico > > Try dpkg --compare-versions Noel er Envite
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.