OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 21:58, Alexander Bürger <acfbuerger@googlemail.com> disait: >> ... acknowledge ... NMU ... > I thought so too, but I did not know what to write there, so I skipped > it. Maybe "thanks for the NMU of 0.17-1.1"? I can hardly put > "(Closes: 455650)" as the bug is already closed and archived. What do > you suggest? Well, an NMU should not close a bug. The BTS should just note that the bug have been corrected in an NMU but not close the bug. Then, you put this in debian/changelog: * Acknowledge NMU (Closes: #455650) It cannot harm a bug that has been closed. ;-) >> ... must also add the given patch since the problem seems to be not fixed in the >> new upstream source... > Well, the patch was to add "#include <cstring>" at the top of > fig2sxd.cpp, and this is also added in the upstream version 0.18. On my > computer, it compiles with g++-4.3 without warnings. Sorry, I have just not looked carefully enough. That's fine then. ;-) -- Follow each decision as closely as possible with its associated action. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Attachment:
pgpSm2dpYfI0_.pgp
Description: PGP signature