[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: opus, uuwaf



On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 16:22 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > The reason is that some other applications we have depend upon the
> > framework, but don't use the preferences system. 

IMHO a good enough reason for a package split. No other explanation is
necessary in my book.

> Well, I  understand the purpose, but  from a Debian point  of view, this
> package is  useless and  should be merged. 

I disagree. This is a functional package split - the kind of thing that
needs to be encouraged in Debian to allow choice. Why should the package
provide a preference system on all installations when it is perfectly
usable without it and some other mechanism can be used.

This sounds perfect for Recommends: to me - most will probably use it
but allow for some that have specialized needs.

>  I understand that  this will
> imply more work  for your internal work since you  will have to continue
> to maintain privately separate packages.

That, IMHO, is a crazy request.

-- 
Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: