Re: RFS: thailatex (updated package)
On Feb 6, 2008 9:48 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 9:23 PM, Paul Wise <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'm not so sure if this is OK, what do the texlive Debian people say?
> > The change in the postinst looks fairly simple, perhaps it could be
> > integrated into texlive?
> Again, I think that would cause kind of dangling pointer, and
> would make texlive-latex-base depend on thailatex for the
> missing part.
> With upstream thailatex's hat on, I agree with Norbert
> Preining's previous comment that it should be eventually
> merged into upstream babel. And that's actually thailatex's
> final goal.
Would this be OK? Should it be uploaded?