Re: How package a binary library with unversioned soname?
Nikolaus Schulz <microschulz@web.de> writes:
> So, one cannot produce valid shlibs files for these libraries. But
> these are required by policy. That is, as Steve Langasek has
> pointed out in [2], the policy de-facto requires libraries to have
> versioned sonames.
The Debian policy only applies to packages in Debian. The software
you're discussing won't be in Debian (because it's non-free), and is
not subject to Debian policy.
--
\ "Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, |
`\ Brain, but if the plural of mouse is mice, wouldn't the plural |
_o__) of spouse be spice?" -- _Pinky and The Brain_ |
Ben Finney
Reply to: