On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote: > > > Now to detect that the user did (not) change the conf file, I check the > > > md5sum of the content of the appropriate conf file 'except' for the Alias > > > line. > > > And as far as I can see this is something ucf cannot handle...or am I wrong > > > here? > > > > Uhh. From apt-cache show ucf > > Luis, I think you missed a critical bit of what's being done with the config > file -- the md5sum of only part of the config file is being checked, which > (unless it's has had some *very* interesting features added lately) ucf > can't do. Indeed. Must read more carefuly next time. Now, from a mentoring point of view, what should kku do? Create the file on first install acording to the user's answer, then consider the *resulting* file a conffile and treat it accordingly? -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature