Re: debian/rules::dh_* comments as rejection criteria
Bart Martens <bartm@knars.be> wrote:
> Anyway, I don't see a problem with the readability of debian/rules with
> the commented dh_ lines, and I agree with Jari Aalto that leaving the
> commented dh_ lines can be useful, so I would vote "allow" if a
> discussion would be held for this.
I disagree. If you aren't able to figure out a sane order for the dh_
calls by yourself, you shouldn't be maintaining the package IMO (of
course, you could maintain a private package for yourself and your
friends, but we are talking here about packages that are uploaded to the
Debian archive).
--
Florent
Reply to: