Hi Maarten, On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 04:55:31PM +0100, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > I see you're updating these tools depending on libcifpp. Cool, saves me some > work. I am actually not actively working on libcifpp. I uploaded cif-tools since a bug was lying unfixed there, and needed a simple recompilation. And I did a source-only for libcifpp since this was creating a autoremoval havoc :) > But are you planning to re-submit libpdb-redo as well? That would solve a > lot of issues with potential removals from testing. I don't plan to do this yet, but if this is very high prio then.... > E.g., libzeep is threatened to be be kicked out due to the fact that a test > in libpdb-redo links against libzeep5.1 itself and via libpdb-redo to > libzeep5.0 as well. And that crashes of course. Right. > Now I don't think a lot of other tools are using libpdb-redo yet. So simply > recompiling libpdb-redo would solve this. Right again. > I can also do some work on this, but it is perhaps not smart to work on this > concurrently, some scheduling might be appropriate. It'd be nice if you could carry fwd the work here. I'm sorry that we ran into a race-condition. Since you already have DM perms on these, please make desired changes and dput as needed. Admittedly, I need to focus my energies on other set of packages for now. Hope you understand. Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature