Re: Status of Altree
Hi again,
please do not leave us alone with fixing RC bugs (#669551) in altree
with not even give us some status information. I do not mind about
this bug which is simple enough to fix - but I always are pretty
unsure whether to package the latest version per version number on
http://claire.bardel.free.fr/files/
or whether your arguing on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2009/08/msg00104.html
remains valid even for the 1.1.1 version. I can not imagine that
somebody has so less time to not even answer this simple question.
For the moment I changed debian/watch in a way that it hides version
1.1.1 from our view and I really hope that this is in your interest.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:34:17AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> some kind of yearly ping. It is a bit hard to handle this upgrade
> problem because of a lack of communication. I think I understood that
> you can not spend time on this problem however, I have suggested ways to
> cope with this (temporary?) ENOTIME problem. Asking the Debian Perl
> team or even Debian Med team for packaging the dependencies would not be
> a big deal. But we need your input about the stability of the newer
> version. Your last statement[1] about the stability of new version is a
> bit outdated. As a hint for upstream: If you are not sure about the
> stability of a version it is better not to release it and rather mark
> clearly the alpha / beta status in the version string.
>
> Please give some reasonable advise to the Debian Med team, which could
> be:
>
> 1. Update the currently avialable package of verison 1.0.1
> (in this case I would really love if you would rename your
> upstream tarball to 1.1.0{alpha,beta} or something like this
> which enables us adapting the watch file to not fetch this)
> 2. Confirm that 1.1.0 is stable and can be packaged
> 3. Altree should be removed from Debian at all because it is
> unmaintained.
> 4. ???
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2009/08/msg00104.html
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 08:48:06AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > I have not heard for one year from you. Please give us a short update
> > about altree. As I suggested we might ask the help of the Perl team to
> > get the needed preconditions packaged. However, we need to know whether
> > this is worth the effort. Your last statements about the status of
> > altree were not completely clear to me.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:39:37PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 23/03/2010 11:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Hi again Vincent,
> > > >
> > > > Update about libnanova: I had a look into your packaging[3] which seems
> > > > OK so far and interesting for Debian Med. Unfortunately I'm missing
> > > > information about the library at the mentioned homepage. It lists some
> > > > information about Claire Bardel-Danjean (your wife ;-))
> > >
> > > Yes, and I stress her so that she answers instead of feeding the baby :-)
> > >
> > > > but nothing about the library and where to download potential future releases.
> > >
> > > Nanova (and the perl bindings NAnova) is a implementation of Nested Anova
> > > wrote by Claire and me following an old research paper.
> > > I ask Claire to fill the documentation in order to cite this article
> > > but also to explain that this method does not work in all cases
> > > (sometimes, variance estimations give negative results...)
> > >
> > > > Could you please clarify a bit?
> > >
> > > The idea would be to add some documentation (article references,
> > > problems and perl module documentation) and make a 'official' release.
> > > The tar.gz will somewhere on http://claire.bardel.free.fr/software.html
> > >
> > > Claire : do you think you can do that this week ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vincent
> > >
> > > > Kind regards
> > > >
> > > > Andreas.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:06:04AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > >> Hi Vincent,
> > > >>
> > > >> once you wrote on this list[1] that the new version of altree is not
> > > >> really fit for an official package. Because there are some further new
> > > >> versions I wonder whether you can give a status update. Moreover I
> > > >> stumbled upon your repository of inofficial packages[2] which just
> > > >> contains the preconditions for altree you mentioned in your mail[1]
> > > >> (libtamuanova-perl, nanova and libnanova-perl). I wonder whether it is
> > > >> a clever idea to make these preconditions really official packages to be
> > > >> quick in a possible altree upgrade. We might aproach a freeze sooner or
> > > >> later and then it is possible to late to integrate the preconditions.
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards and thanks for your work on altree
> > > >>
> > > >> Andreas.
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2009/08/msg00104.html
> > > >> [2] http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
> > > >
> > > > [3] http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/debian/pool/main/n/nanova/nanova_1.0-2.dsc
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble
> > > Téléphone: +33 4 76 61 20 11 ENSIMAG - antenne de Montbonnot
> > > Fax: +33 4 76 61 20 99 ZIRST 51, avenue Jean Kuntzmann
> > > Email: Vincent.Danjean@imag.fr 38330 Montbonnot Saint Martin
> > >
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110325074806.GC18167@an3as.eu
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120326083417.GD16366@an3as.eu
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: