Re: question on Tasks usage
Thanks for your answer.
In fact I do not have "urgent" need for ngs tasks, this was an example
to understand behavior.
Classification is certainly not complete, but will never be I think.
Now we could define smaller categories (finer grain) but would be
difficult to maintain (and difficult to place some packages which could
be in several ones)
Regarding your previous email refered in this one, this is true that
biology and med could be splitted in different blends (even tough some
guys in medecin work with biology stuff in research departements), but
this could
be misleading now with all existing references etc... on debian-med that
would not be up-to-date anymore...
Maybe we could define a roadmap for this kind of classification that
could be reviewed/updated on regular basis upon users/developpers
requests ?
Olivier
Le 3/15/11 5:16 PM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
as well as bio-phylogeny) I'm
hesitating a bit. I created the NGS task in Travemünde and started a
discussion about it at [1]. In a similar manner I added the Phylogeny
task later when I visited a workshop here in m
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (pgp.mit.edu)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
Reply to: