Hi Antoine,
> I see you have the `tiff` package claimed in dla-needed.txt, but not
> `tiff3`. I suspect both are fairly similar issues and that you intended
> to work on both, so I figured it might be better to claim both next
> time.
Right, I will prepare an upload for both packages at the same time.
> But I haven't seen new activity on the packages since then, do you need
> a review of the patches you submitted in March? Or for someone to carry
> this work forward?
Yes, I am still working on this issue. Please have a look at the bug
report / upstream MR[0], last update 2 days ago.
Cheers,
Hugo
[0] https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/merge_requests/27
--
Hugo Lefeuvre (hle) | www.owl.eu.com
4096/ 9C4F C8BF A4B0 8FC5 48EB 56B8 1962 765B B9A8 BACA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature