Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 497-1] wireshark security update

[Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>]

2016-05-31 14:31 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>:
> Dear LTS Team,
>
> 2016-05-31 14:19 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>:
>> Hi Bjoern,
>>
>> 2016-05-31 13:27 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Nyjorden <brn@iinet.net.au>:
>>> Hi there;
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, as at 11:17 (+0000); This UPDATE IS NOT AVAILABLE at the
>>> AUSTRALIAN REGION MIRROR (IP: 150.203.164.61) of:
>>>
>>> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/w/wireshark/
>>>
>>> If the update is already available at other IPs for the above address, can
>>> someone please ensure that it is pushed out to the Australian Region mirror
>>> at the earliest opportunity?
>>
>> I'm deeply sorry for sending out the DLA too early. The update will be available
>> soon in the archive.
>>
>> For the record all of the vulnerabilities listed in the DLA are public
>> thus receiving
>> the email early does not pose extra risk for the systems having the previous
>> version of the package.
>
> I have uploaded the package to security-master yesterday and prepared
> the DLA today.
>
> I have misread the description of debian-lts-announce and thought it
> was moderated, too,
> like debian-lts-changes, thus I expected the DLA to be held back if it
> comes early.
>
> While I will keep in mind _not_ sending the DLA out too erarly, would
> it make sense
> to make debian-lts-announce moderated to catch mistakes like mine?

Is there anything I can do to speed up the acceptance of the updated package?

Thanks,
Balint