lh_config question

Subject: lh_config question
From: daniel at debian.org (Daniel Baumann)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:21:41 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 484EE255.4080601@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200806102139.01200.marco.amadori@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 41c724120806101000x195212fex426b0495a1346fbc@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200806102139.01200.marco.amadori@gmail.com>

Marco Amadori wrote:
> Yes, I put it there because I think it was wanted, since  ${LH_CONFFILE} is 
> sourced just below.

the idea is to have the system-wide defaults to be used, but as soon as
any custom conffile, any existing config/* or any parameter for the same
variable is given, it will be overwritten. this is the way of least
surprise.

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann at panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- lh_config question
  - From: amadorim at vdavda.com (Marco Amadori)

References:
- lh_config question
  - From: juergen.fiedler at gmail.com (Juergen Fiedler)
- lh_config question
  - From: marco.amadori at gmail.com (Marco Amadori)

Prev by Date: lh_config question
Next by Date: 999 bug
Previous by thread: lh_config question
Next by thread: lh_config question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread