Le jeudi 8 février 2024, 18:31:28 UTC Santiago Ruano Rincón a écrit : > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:23:18 +0200 Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 12:14:07AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Package: lintian > > > Version: 2.115.3 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Lintian issues these errors for putty 0.77-1: > > > > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixA.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixB.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/AppendixE.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter10.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter2.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter3.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter4.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter5.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter7.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter8.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/Chapter9.html] > > > E: putty source: source-is-missing [doc/html/IndexPage.html] > > > > > > This is pretty oversensitive. Firstly, it's HTML, which is still often > > > enough written by hand anyway. As it happens, these particular HTML > > > files are generated from halibut input that's also provided in the > > > source package, though I can't see how Lintian could possibly expect to > > > know that. Are you sure it is not embdeded base64 encoded png or minified javascript* ? If not we could try to know why it choke ? In this particular case, it is the source package that choke. If halibut include the name of the source in the html we could magically remove the source is missing warnings. Another alternative if we could determine the file was compiled by halibut, we could demote to pedantic warning and ask to repack in order to be sure to recompile from source. Thanks > > > > Dear Lintian maintainers, > > > > This test is causing hundreds of false positive and should be disabled as > > soon as possible. This is a huge waste of time for everybody. > > > > If you need help with that, please tell me, I have worked on lintian in the past. > > Dear Lintian maintainers, > > I cannot offer the same help as ballombe, but I also find it would help > to disable these errors. At least, could they be "demoted" to warnings? > Thanks in advance, > > Santiago >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.