Re: lintian test suite
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-12-24 14:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 12:01 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I had a look at the test suite and it is only a few hick-ups short of
>> being issue free (at least on a x86). I have attached the failures I saw.
>
> This one:
>
> -E: package-version-0 source: upstream-version-not-numeric unknown
>
> was a side-effect of a bug in Dpkg::Changelog. Russ filed #587382 at
> the same time as committing the change adding the above to the expected
> result; as the dpkg bug has now been fixed in unstable and testing for a
> while, we should probably just remove the tag from the test's tags file.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
Cool, I have fixed that now. So the new test suite now only suffers from
the false positive t/scripts/minimum-version.t.
I might have a look at dealing with the libbaz issue tomorrow. :)
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=sgoG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: