Bug#507096: marked as done (lintian: should library-not-linked-against-libc exclude debug library files?)
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:20:17 -0800
with message-id <87myei13v2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#507096: lintian: should library-not-linked-against-libc exclude debug library files?
has caused the Debian Bug report #507096,
regarding lintian: should library-not-linked-against-libc exclude debug library files?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
507096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507096
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: lintian: should library-not-linked-against-libc exclude debug library files?
- From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:37:17 +0100
- Message-id: <20081127233717.5972.37698.reportbug@dhcp-rnd-038.intranet.astaro.de>
Package: lintian
Version: 1.24.2.1
Severity: normal
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/library-not-linked-against-libc.html
certainly seems to suggest that.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii diffstat 1.45-2 produces graph of changes introduc
ii dpkg-dev 1.14.22 Debian package development tools
ii file 4.26-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gettext 0.17-4 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1 Help i18n of RFC822 compliant conf
ii libdigest-sha-perl 5.47-1 Perl extension for SHA-1/224/256/3
ii libparse-debianchan 1.1.1-2 parse Debian changelogs and output
ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-9 Time and date functions for Perl
ii liburi-perl 1.35.dfsg.1-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii man-db 2.5.2-3 on-line manual pager
ii perl [libdigest-sha 5.10.0-17 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
lintian recommends no packages.
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii binutils-multiarch 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7 Binary utilities that support mult
ii libtext-template-pe 1.44-1.2 Text::Template perl module
ii man-db 2.5.2-3 on-line manual pager
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 507096-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#507096: lintian: should library-not-linked-against-libc exclude debug library files?
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 23:20:17 -0800
- Message-id: <87myei13v2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
- In-reply-to: <9E1DB530CDD84624B3050A18FC657431@andromeda> (Adam D. Barratt's message of "Fri\, 28 Nov 2008 09\:13\:04 -0000")
- References: <20081127233717.5972.37698.reportbug@dhcp-rnd-038.intranet.astaro.de> <9E1DB530CDD84624B3050A18FC657431@andromeda>
Version: 2.1.0
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:37:17 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/library-not-linked-against-libc.html
>> certainly seems to suggest that.
>
> From the few quick tests I've done, I believe the fact that the debug
> libraries are listed at all is due to an issue with the "etch objdump
> emulation" code, which I fixed in
> 6c73347d83c75d83dd5c01f6308ecfccc4fa793b; specifically, we should not
> attempt to run readelf on the library if objdump returned "invalid
> operation".
>
> I'll check each of the packages listed, but at least anjuta-dbg and
> evolution-dbg do not produce the warnings when checked using HEAD in an
> etch chroot (in fact, anjuta-dbg also loses another debug-related
> warning relative to the version currently installed on lintian.d.o).
>
> (Another good reason we should probably release 2.1.0... :-)
Looks like this was indeed fixed in 2.1.0. No debug packages turn up in
the report for that tag on lintian.d.o now.
Closing.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---
Reply to: