lintian: r826 - in trunk: checks debian
Author: rra
Date: 2007-02-27 08:53:04 +0100 (Tue, 27 Feb 2007)
New Revision: 826
Modified:
trunk/checks/po-debconf
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/po-debconf:
+ [RA] Now that we're passing --use-untranslated to msgcmp, we have to
compare the generated pot file with the one in the package both
directions to catch all out of date errors. Thanks, Thomas
Huriaux. (Closes: #402662)
Modified: trunk/checks/po-debconf
===================================================================
--- trunk/checks/po-debconf 2007-02-27 07:37:27 UTC (rev 825)
+++ trunk/checks/po-debconf 2007-02-27 07:53:04 UTC (rev 826)
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@
if ($missing_files == 0) {
$ENV{"INTLTOOL_EXTRACT"} ||= "/usr/share/intltool-debian/intltool-extract";
system_env("cd debfiles/po && /usr/share/intltool-debian/intltool-update --gettext-package=test --pot");
- system_env("/usr/bin/msgcmp --use-untranslated debfiles/po/test.pot debfiles/po/templates.pot >/dev/null 2>&1") == 0
+ system_env("/usr/bin/msgcmp --use-untranslated debfiles/po/test.pot debfiles/po/templates.pot >/dev/null 2>&1"
+ . "&& /usr/bin/msgcmp --use-untranslated debfiles/po/templates.pot debfiles/po/test.pot >/dev/null 2>&1") == 0
or tag "newer-debconf-templates";
}
} else {
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2007-02-27 07:37:27 UTC (rev 825)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog 2007-02-27 07:53:04 UTC (rev 826)
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
* checks/nmu.desc:
+ [RA] List the exact phrases recognized by lintian as marking an NMU.
Reported by Jari Aalto. (Closes: #409108)
+ * checks/po-debconf:
+ + [RA] Now that we're passing --use-untranslated to msgcmp, we have to
+ compare the generated pot file with the one in the package both
+ directions to catch all out of date errors. Thanks, Thomas
+ Huriaux. (Closes: #402662)
* checks/scripts{.desc,}:
+ [RA] update-inetd is now its own package and netbase may not always
depend on it. Update the check to require a dependency on
Reply to: