On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Walter Landry wrote: > Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> wrote: [...] > > ...as far as I understand, Eben Moglen believes Option *3* to be > > GPL-compatible (see the message that started this thread). > > Now we are talking about Option 2. > > Actually, in the referenced web page > > http://www.w3.org/2011/03/html-license-options.html > > there is the claim > > Views within the PSIG differ on how each license satisfies each use > cases. The primary sources of disagreement relate to one's view of > the following: > > * the GPL-compatibility of a license. Note: Eben Moglen has stated > that he considers Options 2 and 3 to be GPL-compatible. Ouch! :-( I hadn't noticed that. Thanks for pointing it out! This makes things even more puzzling than before. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpRDwWZV1lNm.pgp
Description: PGP signature