On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:28:27 ajdlinux@gmail.com wrote: > On 6/28/07, Bruno Costacurta <pubmb01@skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello, > > porting to GnuTLS is something we'll avoid. > > > > About the issues mentioned before, I can answer and propose : > > > > - the actual code implemented a strong separation layer between OpenSSL > > and Qt > > (review of code can be made by independent party) thus licenses should > > not be > > mixed in their interpretations. > > Well, if the FSF is right in their interpretation, this isn't enough. > As long as a GPL library is linked to anything else, the GPL requires > that the whole lot be GPL. OpenSSL is not GPL compatible. > > > - current license / copyright might be adapted (meaning 'enforced and > > clarified', not 'relaxed') to answer concerns. > > What do you mean? Well, the project team was thinking about something like an 'advertising-special-exception-whatever-clause'. Something acceptable is a such direction by sirs FSF, GPL and others ? ;-( Bye, Bruno > > -- > Andrew Donnellan <>< > ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure) > http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com > ajdlinux@jabber.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58 > http://linux.org.au http://debian.org > Spammers only === ajdspambucket@exemail.com.au === -- PGP key ID: 0x2e604d51 Key server: hkp://subkeys.pgp.net Key fingerprint = 713F 7956 9441 7DEF 58ED 1951 7E07 569B 2E60 4D51 --
Attachment:
pgptrIWLlcq11.pgp
Description: PGP signature