On Sat, 13 May 2006 15:03:19 +0200 Uwe Hermann wrote: > Hi, > > Crimson Fields includes a *.mid file which has the following license: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- License for the soundtrack > > Quite simply, you have two choices. The music, as distributed with > Crimson Fields, is covered under the GNU General Public License, same > version(s) as the game itself. That is enough for the soundtrack to comply with the DFSG. Fine! :) > If you choose to separate the music > from the game without using it in other software, the GNU General > Public License is likely not to provide the level of protection the > music requires. This is because the GPL was written for software, > specifically, and there are other, better licenses to choose for > content such as music. Therefore, if you separate the music from the > software, you may also choose the Creative Commons license described > below. It is recommended that you do so, because otherwise you may > find yourself with the GPL unenforceable on the music, and you will > have no license for the music otherwise. I strongly dislike all this FUD about the GNU GPL. The author of this permission notice should really *read* licenses before spreading misconceptions about them... The very text of the GNU GPL v2 (section 0.) defines the term "Program" (please note the capital letter) as: | any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this | General Public License I don't see how the GPL could be considered "unenforceable on the music" (whatever that may mean)... > > Copyright Notice > > default.mid - Default Symphony > (c) 2004 by Dave Fancella, david.fancella@seul.org > > The Creative Commons License chosen guarantees all the same rights of > the GPL with the exception of a requirement of attribution. This is definitely false. > > Creative Commons License > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/ > > Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0 [...] > This is a human-readable summary of the Legal Code (the full license). > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > I _think_ that should be ok, just wanted to make sure. I think it's OK (even though upstream seems to be misled by Creative Commons propaganda or something...). -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) ...................................................................... Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpIwjt2W_pqF.pgp
Description: PGP signature