On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:05:03 -0500 Charles Fry wrote: > > Once again, I repeat my claim: that the 3.01 version of the PHP > > License is equally fit for licensing PHP itself and PHP Group > > software. This claim has been upheld over months of sporadic > > discussion on the matter at debian-legal. > > Given the lack of disagreement on this issue, I would again like to > > request that the FTP Masters update their policy to accept PHP Group > > packages with the PHP License, in addition to PHP itself. Or in the > > absense of a willingness to do so, please step forward so that we can > > further this discussion and deal professionally with the upstream > > authors of the current RC bugs related to the PHP License. > Please help persuading the PHP Group to fix the license once and for all > (at least for PHP itself and other PHP Group software, or even better > for every software it's applied to). Persuade them to fix *what*? The message you just quoted says he believes the license has already been fixed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature