On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:20:17PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote: > I can't see how can > programX possibly be a derivative work of libopenssl or of libnvossl. > Can you please explain it to me, like if I was a four-year-old? You stole somebody else's work when you wrote programX. Piracy is wrong. You are destroying the hopes and dreams of an entire industry. [0] > > Your entire argument is based on the fact that it's nonsense for > > dynamic linking because replacing one external run-time library with > > another shouldn't change the copyright status of the program using > > it. Yes, it's nonsense - but you're the one who introduced it. The > > introduction of dynamic linking was the mistaken assumption. > > Why is the introduction of dynamic linking the mistaken assumption? This was explained in the part you deleted. [0] This appears to be the way it is explained to four-year-olds -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature