<quote who="MJ Ray" date="2005-03-29 19:07:01 +0000"> > If the licensor includes that term in the copyright conditions for > the work, I don't think that CC's opinion matters much, unless they > are granting an unrestricted royalty-free trademark > permission. After all, the copyright licensor could include > something really daft like "you must not use the word 'the'" as an > extra condition should they wish. So, if we treat this as a freedom issue in situations where the licensor has created a new version that does not include the comment/bounding box and/or where we have reason to believe the licensor feels that this is in fact part of the license, but do not treat this as a freeodm issue when documents are licensed in the normal way with a hyperlink to this page, would it be alright with you? I apologize if I misunderstood. Of course, in any situation, we should lobby to have this changed. I'm just trying to divide the must-have freedom issues from the "it can and should be changed" issues. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill mako@debian.org http://mako.yukidoke.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature