On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:09:18PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote: > But still there's a lot of cruft in it that might be just confusing for > an author who considers GPL for his text, or even add confusion to a > possible lawsuit. Licenses *are* confusing. Not our fault, nor can we do anything about it; there's a limit to the effectiveness of the anti-lawyer spray we use. Deal with it. Any scenario which appears to contain a license which isn't confusing is one which contains a license you don't understand properly, and should be treated with the utmost suspicion, just like a perpetual motion machine. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature