Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
> * Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030912 10:20]:
> > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
> >
> > > * Richard Stallman (rms@gnu.org) [030912 02:20]:
> > > > I considered this possibility in the 1980s, not as an option but
> > > > rather as a potential problem. So I developed a method to make sure
> > > > this would not happen: invariant sections. The danger has not gone
> > > > away, so we still need invariant sections.
> > >
> > > That's really "end of discussion". If this clear wordings stands also
> > > for the FSF, than there is nothing how the manuals can become free.
>
> > [become free _SOFTWARE_]
>
> become free in the sense of Debian. And that means: free according to
> the DFSG.
Hum, you mean in the sense of the Debian Free _SOFTWARE_ Guidelines?
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
Reply to: