Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
* Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030909 16:20]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
> > * Mathieu Roy (yeupou@gnu.org) [030909 13:50]:
> > > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> a tapoté :
> > > > Sorry, but there is certainly non-free software that provide freedom
> > > > equally to GFDL.
^^^^^^^
> > > Name one.
> > qmail.
> Unfortunately, you are wrong.
> I'll just give the most obvious reason:
> For a GFDL documentation, you do not need the author approval to
> distribute modified versions.
qmail allowes to be transfered over ssh, GFDLed docu not. I said
"equally", not "exactly same license" on purpose. Please start
reading.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: