Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant?
- To: Debian Legal <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant?
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:52:05 +0100
- Message-id: <20030903085205.GC2303@doc.ic.ac.uk>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian Legal <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20030831200648.GA24895@doc.ic.ac.uk>
- References: <20030831075410.GA7297@rosenberg.net> <1062334552.1008.99.camel@note.macrology.co.nz> <20030831135054.GA6968@rosenberg.net> <1062345198.1627.91.camel@note.macrology.co.nz> <20030831200648.GA24895@doc.ic.ac.uk>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 09:06:48PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> In this case, all the patent-related clauses are a no-op. When there
> actually _are_ patents involved... that's tricky. I'm not sure about
> that yet.
I am now. It's a clear violation of DFSG#7.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
Attachment:
pgpb1BprfBwyo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: